Evidence

Published Research

Dozens of studies have been conducted on the effects of the FAST® Program. Results show that participation in the program has been linked to:

For more studies related to FAST’s effectiveness, refer to this bibliography.


Randomized Control Trials

The program’s effectiveness has been demonstrated in several Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), studies in which participants are randomly assigned to a group that participates in a program or a control group that does not. This type of study is valued for measuring effectiveness while minimizing bias. 

RCT #6
FAST (Families and Schools Together): An Innovative, Targeted Strategy for Removing Key Barriers to School Turnaround
Grant
U.S. Department of Education, Investing in Innovation (i3) grant
Principal Investigator(s)
Tom Kratochwill
Years
2013-2018
Focus
This RCT looked at the extent to which offering FAST to incoming kindergarteners and their families would contribute to turning around persistently low-performing schools and improving the academic outcomes of participating students. The study took place in Philadelphia public schools.
Related Article(s)

Bos, J., Spier, E., Bandeira de Mello, V., Gonzalez, R., & Huang, F. (2018). Investing in Innovation (i3) Validation Study of Families and Schools Together (FAST). AIR (American Institutes for Research).

Gonzalez, R., Huang, F., Spier, E., Bos, J., & Holtzman, D. (2018). FAST in Philadelphia: Exploring the Implementation of a Family Engagement Program. AIR (American Institutes for Research).

RCT #5
Can FAST Build Social Capital Among Low-Income, Urban Latino Families
Grant
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) grant no. R01HD051762-01A2
Principal Investigator(s)
Ruth Lopez Turley, Adam Gamoran, Alyn Turner, Rachel Fish, Carmen R. Valdez, Dr. Lynn McDonald
Years
2008-2010
Focus
This RCT looked at whether and how social capital (defined as: trust and shared expectations embedded in social networks of parents, teachers, and children) has an effect on children’s social and cognitive development during the early elementary years. The children in the study were from low-income Latino families in San Antonio and Phoenix.
Related Article(s)

Fiel, J. E., Haskins, A. R., & Turley, R. N. L. (2013). Reducing school mobility: A randomized trial of a relationship-building intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1188-1218.

Gamoran, A., Turley, R. N. L., Turner, A., & Fish, R. (2012). Differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic families in social capital and child development: First-year findings from an experimental study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 97-112.

McDonald, L., Miller, H., & Sandler, J. (2015). A social ecological, relationship-based strategy for parent involvement: Families and Schools Together (FAST). Journal of Children’s Services, 10(3), 218-230.

Rangel, D. E., Shoji, M. N., & Gamoran, A. (2020). The development and sustainability of school-based parent networks in low-income Latinx communities: A mixed-methods investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 57(6), 2450-2484.

Shoji, M. N., Haskins, A. R., Rangel, D. E., & Sorensen, K. N. (2014). The emergence of social capital in low-income Latino elementary schools. Early childhood research quarterly, 29(4), 600-613.

Turley, R. N. L., Gamoran, A., McCarty, A. T., & Fish, R. (2017). Reducing children’s behavior problems through social capital: A causal assessment. Social science research, 61, 206-217.

RCT #4
An Intervention for Children with Emotional Disabilities or High Risk for Special Education Services
Grant
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services (OSERS)
Principal Investigator(s)
Thomas R. Kratochwill, Lynn McDonald, Joel R. Levin
Years
2000-2002
Focus
Designed as an intervention for children with emotional disabilities or high risk for special education services, this study aimed to test FAST’S ability to strengthen family relationships and build a support network for families within the school. Overall, FAST had a positive impact on reducing the number of special education referrals for students who participated with their families.  FAST families scored higher on the Family Adaptability Scale, and FAST parents rated their children as being less aggressive. Furthermore, fewer FAST students ended up receiving special education services than students in the control condition, which indicates that there are cost saving benefits of using FAST as a prevention tool.
Related Article(s)

Kratochwill, T. R., McDonald, L., Levin, J. R., Scalia, P. A., & Coover, G. (2009). Families and schools together: An experimental study of multi-family support groups for children at risk. Journal of School Psychology, 47(4), 245-265.

RCT #3
Reduce Aggressive and Delinquent Behaviors in Low-income, Urban Latino Children After 8 Weeks of FAST
Grant
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grant R01-10067
Principal Investigator(s)
D. Paul Moberg, Lynn McDonald
Years
1997-1999
Focus
This RCT involved randomly assigning second-grade classrooms to either FAST or a comparison condition called FAME in 10 inner-city elementary schools serving at-risk, low-income communities. The study included a 2-year follow-up. Teacher ratings of children‘s academic performance in the FAST group were significantly higher than in the comparison group, and FAST parents reported lower family social support than FAME families. Among Latino children at two years, teachers rated children in FAST as less aggressive and with higher social skills than children in FAME. Among African American children at two years, teacher ratings of internalizing behavior were higher in the FAST group, with no other between group differences in outcomes.
Related Article(s)

McDonald, L., Moberg, D. P., Brown, R., Rodriguez-Espiricueta, I., Flores, N. I., Burke, M. P., & Coover, G. (2006). After-school multifamily groups: A randomized controlled trial involving low-income, urban, Latino children. Children & Schools, 28(1), 25-34.

Moberg, P., McDonald, L, Posner, J., Burke, M., & Brown, R (2007). Randomized Trial of Families and Schools Together (FAST): Final Report on NIDA Grant R01-10067.

RCT #2
Families and Schools Together: An Experimental Analysis of a Parent-Mediated Early Intervention Program for At-Risk American Indian Children
Grant
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) Grant
Principal Investigator(s)
Thomas R. Kratochwill, Holly Young-Bear Tibbitts, Lynn McDonald, Joel R. Levin
Years
2004 (publication year)
Focus
This study used a sample of students from three American Indian Nations in rural Northern Wisconsin. The goal was to test whether participation in the FAST program could improve academic performance while reducing problematic behavior. Overall, this adaptation of FAST proved very successful. Teachers reported a statistically significant decrease in aggression, delinquency, and social conflict among students who had participated in FAST, as opposed to the students in the control group.  In addition, they perceived an increase in academic competence.
Related Article(s)

Kratochwill, T. R., McDonald, L., Levin, J. R., Scalia, P. A., & Coover, G. (2009). Families and schools together: An experimental study of multi-family support groups for children at risk. Journal of School Psychology, 47(4), 245-265.

RCT #1
Improve Behavior Problems in Low-Income, African American Children in Urban New Orleans
Grant
Administration of Children and Families (ACYF) ABT: National Evaluation of Family Support Programs
Principal Investigator(s)
Jean Layzer, Barbara Goodson, Cindy Creps, Alan Werner, Lawrence Bernstein
Years
1997-1999
Focus
This study assessed the long-term impacts on children and their families of the FAST Program. An experimental study of the program was conducted in nine schools in New Orleans, and included two cohorts with a total of approximately 400 children and their families. The program was successful in engaging a group of low income families, a substantial proportion of whose children exhibited serious behavior problems.One year after the program ended, FAST parents reported fewer behavior problems in their children compared with parents of children in the comparison group. A larger proportion of these parents reported that they had engaged in volunteer work and had occupied a leadership position of some kind.
Related Article(s)

Layzer, J., Goodson, B., Creps, C., Werner, A., & Bernstein, L (2001). National Evaluation of Family Support Programs Volume B: Research Studies Final Report.

Evidence-based lists & Databases